In Robot in Denial, you’re confronted with the collision between human and machine — between consciousness, technology, and mortality. The robot doesn’t appear as a cold invention, but as a being that hesitates, desires, and fails in its attempt to become human.
Created between 2014 and 2015, the series includes sculptures, videos, and installations in which irony and tragedy intertwine.
In the first phase of the project, three sculptures depict a robot attempting suicide in three different ways. The works visualize the collision between rational technology and irrational emotion — between mechanical logic and existential despair.
Niko Hendrickx’ latest installation is a sinister affair: a robot commits suicide in three different – fairly traditional – ways: he hangs himself from a tree, he cuts his wrists while lying in a bathtub and he shoots himself in the head. Originally the installation was entitled Robot in Denial. The way the title change came about is typical of Hendrickx’ artistic approach. After having completed the work, he made a video version of it.
While looking for an appropriate music score, he stumbled on the Langham Research Centre in the UK, who make recordings ‘the old-fashioned way’, i.e. with analogue equipment. In February 2014 they released John Cage -Early Electronic and Tape Music, which contains the piece Imaginary Landscapes No. 5, amongst others. Hendrickx immediately saw the potential of the composition for his own work, and changed his title accordingly. In doing so he purposely allows ‘chance’ to play a part in his art.
Interpretation
For most of us suicide is a shocking, or at least a controversial and disturbing subject. That is evidently the case in Hendrickx’ work, too, but at the same time there is a touch of irony in it: it is, indeed, a robot who commits the fatal act. This anthropoid has obviously evolved so far in his artificial intelligence that he imitates man even in his choice of death, thus denying his own existence of wiring and electronic circuitry. For a robot choosing ‘the human way’ to end his life is futile and inefficient, of course. He does not need a rope or a pistol to end his life – he merely needs to switch off the power source that keeps him running.
In the video some landscapes are realistic, others are digitally designed. The artist suggests that the robot is anxious to see reality, like man, but that he cannot: until further notice his optical sensor will not be able to provide him with more than, indeed, imaginary landscapes, i.e. digital recordings of reality. Today it is still man who creates and controls. It is therefore also man whom the video shows cutting the rope, taking the gun away and emptying the bathtub.
Ethics
Imaginary Landscapes is, like many other works by Hendrickx, about ethics. The artist expresses his concern about technology and science, which seem to move away from us at high speed. Who takes the time to ask the necessary ethical questions? Are we still master of the monster we created, or is it out of control? (iv) (2015)
During the exhibition Strange Fruit at the Gasthuiskapel in Borgloon, you experience how different works from Robot in Denial come together as a single entity. The space becomes a site of confrontation — between the organic and the artificial, the transient and the mechanical.
At the center is the video work Imaginary Landscapes of a Robot in Denial, in which sculptures from the project appear within filmed and digital landscapes. The robot moves through a world oscillating between reality and simulation — both familiar and estranged. What seems real is, in fact, a digital reconstruction of perception.
Along the walls hang paintings from the series The Fruit Bowl (Slow Frame Paintings), where falling fruit mirrors the fall of the robot. The scent of ripening fruit fills the space, a tangible reminder of time and decay. The result is a layered experience in which technology, life, and transience dissolve into one another.
In 2025, three artworks were fitted with aluminum connection points. These elements make it possible to link the works to the modular construction system originally developed between 2003 and 2018 for the project Choose and Change.
Through this system, existing works can be interconnected and brought into new spatial relationships within installations. The connection points create a flexible framework in which individual artworks become part of a larger, ever-evolving whole.
Each work thus shifts from being an autonomous form to becoming an element within a changing network — a sculptural organism that continues to grow and transform.